Professional Seasonal Analysis for Trading

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC)

Seasonality Analysis

ETFs 6 Years Analyzed

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF Annual Seasonality Statistics

10.73%
Avg Annual Return
58.1%
Avg Monthly Win Rate
7/12
Positive Months
6
Years Analyzed

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF Monthly Seasonality Performance

Month Avg Return Win Rate Strength
January 3.06%
83%
Very Strong
February 1.08%
67%
Moderate
March -0.16%
33%
Very Weak
April -1.63%
33%
Very Weak
May 1.82%
80%
Strong
June -0.46%
50%
Weak
July 2.66%
67%
Strong
August 1.74%
67%
Strong
September WORST -2.76%
17%
Very Weak
October 0.58%
67%
Moderate
November BEST 4.94%
83%
Very Strong
December -0.15%
50%
Weak

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF 2026 vs Historical Pattern

Current Position
94.2
Historical Avg Position
47.24
Deviation
+46.96
Performance
Significantly Above Average

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF Interactive Seasonality Chart

Interactive Seasonality Chart

Unlock the full interactive seasonality chart for PAMC with overlay patterns, custom date ranges, and more.

Create Free Account

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF Pattern Scanner

Pattern Scanner

Discover recurring patterns, anomalies, and statistically frequent setups.

Create Free Account

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF Seasonal Historical Performance

Historical Performance

See historical average returns for PAMC across multiple timeframes.

Create Free Account

About Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) Seasonality

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has been analyzed using 6 years of historical data to identify seasonal patterns. Classified under ETFs, Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF shows distinct seasonal tendencies based on historical data.

The strongest month for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is historically November, with an average return of 4.94% and a win rate of 83%. Conversely, September tends to be the weakest month, averaging -2.76% return.

Looking at the full calendar year, Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has an average annual return of 10.73% with an overall monthly win rate of 58.1%. Out of 12 months, 7 typically show positive average returns.

The seasonal pattern for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consistency score of 61.1 (Good), based on 7 years of data. Higher consistency means the seasonal pattern has been more reliable across different market conditions.

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF Seasonality FAQ

What is the best month to buy Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC)?

Historically, November has been the best month for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF, with an average return of 4.94% and a win rate of 83%. However, past performance does not guarantee future results.

What is the worst month for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC)?

Based on historical data, September has been the weakest month for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF, with an average return of -2.76%. This is a historical observation and does not guarantee future results.

How reliable is PAMC seasonality data?

The seasonality analysis for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is based on 6 years of historical price data. While seasonal patterns can provide useful insights, they should be combined with other forms of analysis. Past patterns do not guarantee future performance.

How can I use Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF seasonality in my trading?

Use Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) seasonality as one factor in your analysis. Identify historically strong and weak months, combine with other research methods. SeasOptima provides premium tools including interactive charts, pattern scanning, and historical performance data for deeper analysis.

More ETFs Seasonality Analysis

Statistical information based on historical data. Does not constitute investment advice or recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future results.