Professional Seasonal Analysis for Trading

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD)

Seasonality Analysis

ETFs 20 Years Analyzed

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF Annual Seasonality Statistics

8.65%
Avg Annual Return
56.7%
Avg Monthly Win Rate
11/12
Positive Months
20
Years Analyzed

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF Monthly Seasonality Performance

Month Avg Return Win Rate Strength
January 0.24%
50%
Weak
February 0.50%
60%
Moderate
March 0.03%
55%
Moderate
April BEST 2.72%
65%
Strong
May 1.14%
55%
Moderate
June 0.25%
45%
Weak
July 0.68%
55%
Moderate
August 0.01%
50%
Weak
September WORST -0.68%
55%
Weak
October 0.54%
55%
Moderate
November 2.22%
70%
Strong
December 0.98%
65%
Moderate

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF 2026 vs Historical Pattern

Current Position
48.62
Historical Avg Position
45.24
Deviation
+3.38
Performance
On Track

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF Interactive Seasonality Chart

Interactive Seasonality Chart

Unlock the full interactive seasonality chart for UPGD with overlay patterns, custom date ranges, and more.

Create Free Account

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF Pattern Scanner

Pattern Scanner

Discover recurring patterns, anomalies, and statistically frequent setups.

Create Free Account

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF Seasonal Historical Performance

Historical Performance

See historical average returns for UPGD across multiple timeframes.

Create Free Account

About Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) Seasonality

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) has been analyzed using 20 years of historical data to identify seasonal patterns. Classified under ETFs, Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF shows distinct seasonal tendencies based on historical data.

The strongest month for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF is historically April, with an average return of 2.72% and a win rate of 65%. Conversely, September tends to be the weakest month, averaging -0.68% return.

Looking at the full calendar year, Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF has an average annual return of 8.65% with an overall monthly win rate of 56.7%. Out of 12 months, 11 typically show positive average returns.

The seasonal pattern for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF has a consistency score of 43.2 (Poor), based on 21 years of data. Higher consistency means the seasonal pattern has been more reliable across different market conditions.

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF Seasonality FAQ

What is the best month to buy Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD)?

Historically, April has been the best month for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF, with an average return of 2.72% and a win rate of 65%. However, past performance does not guarantee future results.

What is the worst month for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD)?

Based on historical data, September has been the weakest month for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF, with an average return of -0.68%. This is a historical observation and does not guarantee future results.

How reliable is UPGD seasonality data?

The seasonality analysis for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF is based on 20 years of historical price data. While seasonal patterns can provide useful insights, they should be combined with other forms of analysis. Past patterns do not guarantee future performance.

How can I use Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF seasonality in my trading?

Use Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) seasonality as one factor in your analysis. Identify historically strong and weak months, combine with other research methods. SeasOptima provides premium tools including interactive charts, pattern scanning, and historical performance data for deeper analysis.

More ETFs Seasonality Analysis

Statistical information based on historical data. Does not constitute investment advice or recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future results.